REACTION: “Panda Huggers vs. Dragon Slayers”
Damjan DeNoble of Asia Health Care Blog had this to say about the recent Panda Huggers post.
~~~~
Lets talk about Panda Huggers and Dragon Slayers. I am neither a panda hugger nor a dragon slayer. Instead, I believe that most developed nations are fairly similar in their approaches to acquiring resources and financial might. Eventually, the growth of all developed/quickly developing economies flattens out along an average trajectory. The relevant question to me is how a country reacts to crises – does it show itself to be a fire breathing dragon, or a slothful panda? What kind of transformation is easier for its communal mindset, its people, its military might, and its political ideology to handle?
In Africa, China is doing nothing different from what European powers have been doing for centuries. Trillions of dollars of American, and European foreign aid to Africa are sitting in the Swiss bank vaults of three generations of African dictators and corporate swindlers. We can choose to attribute this sort of waist to the inefficiencies of NGO’s, or we can choose to take the more realistic view that bribing the wheels of justice and power under the cover of foreign aid has long been par for the African course. I might get slammed for that, but like Frank Rich of the New York Times points out, once upon a time Enron was Forbes’ most innovative company six years running, and Tiger Woods was the face of wholesome America.
Yet, despite these similarities, no one ever talks about a three headed dragon of America, the EU, and China working in tandem to gut the African continent. This is interesting. But, why is it so.
I tend to believe that it is a dragon duel. The EU dragon has, to some extent, already had its time of free reign in Africa. One just need to Google the words “Berlin Conference,” “Belgium,” “rubber,” and “genocide,’ or to read a history of the Rwandan genocide to see how. What’s left is really Dragon China and Dragon America, and from either perspective, China’s or America’s, it is a logical media spin to show the foreign dragon and hide one’s own tail.
At the end of the day, America still holds a gigantic advantage on the African continent in terms of influence and China still has a lot of catching up to do. This holds true for oil commitments, minerals, as well as hearts and minds.
Related posts:
- BOOK: The Chan’s Great Continent: China in Western Minds This book came to me on a recommendation and was much-hyped, but it wasn’t...
- China’s Two Domestic Markets Thanks again to Jack Perkowski at Managing the Dragon for his insightful breakdown on China’s...
- Chinese Men Can Kick Ass…But Can’t Get A Kiss Someone whose posts I’ve been enjoying tremendously of late are the thoughtful musings of China-based...
- The Bane of Chinese Packaging Huo Weiya comes to the rescue again with this savvy China Dialogue blog post about...
- Hu Jintao’s Climate Change Speech On September 22, 2009, President Hu of China delivered a climate change speech at the...







