A Desperate Need to Reduce the Number of “Chinese” Blogs…Starting With Mine, Perhaps?

At the Foxhole, Beginning My Afternoon Navel Gaze
14:00 CET
In search of grist…for the mill, of course!

Rats Feeding from the Same Bowl

Have you ever noticed how many English-language Chinese blogs (say that five times fast!) there are?

Sadly, I believe the time has come to drastically reduce the number of these truly redundant boards, these mostly paltry attempts to reinvent the wheel by reprising what’s already been written countless times online. We must begin to streamline these available offerings into a tight fist of “absolute-must-go-to” sites. Absolute online musts which shouldn’t be missed, in other words, with the rest somehow shunted off to the sidelines, clearly delineated as minor league attempts to achieve the same effect as the A-Listers.

I observed this recently while surfing through the offerings at Hao Hao Report, the creation of Ryan McLaughlin, a fellow “crazy Canuck,” and bionic blogger in his own right. I was astounded by the volume of stuff posted there, with seemingly less regard (not no regard, just less) for post quality or post appropriateness. It had been mentioned to me a few weeks ago by a China-blogging fellow and after devoting a considerable amount of time to Hao Hao during yesterday’s European afternoon, I couldn’t agree with the chap more.

In a situation of decentralized Chinese cities, say, where the wonders of the interwebs were unavailable to geographically-disparate expats in search of relevant information or in order to commiserate or seek out fellow-foreign succor, it made sense to have 20 different expatriate magazines or 35 different expatriate newspapers, each replicating the content of the rest. That made sense from an old world media perspective.

But in a Chinese marketplace where everything is being funneled around at the fingering of a hyper-sensitive touchpad, how many redundancies should the market allow?

Again, this seeming polemic piece might remind some of those “Top Ten” lists from a few weeks back, but it’s important to remember that just because one has a right to found and regularly publish to their own blog – thanks (or no thanks?) the decentralization of blogging tools – it doesn’t mean it should always happen.

And what’s more, I’m not telling you anything new here, either.

Andrew Keen has talked about this before in 2007’s The Cult of the Amateur

Cult of the Amateur

and I suspect it still holds true today.

I suppose it would behoove us to produce a list of things we absolutely need to see in our China blogs, dear China blogging enthusiasts, followed by a short list of things we definitely do not need to see.

Things China Blogs Should Have:

  • breaking news content: news and attached photos that are not available on any of the mainstream media channels, either because of the geographic proximity or privileged access of the blogger to the event being discussed, or the fact that the country’s media organs are duly censored (or in Chinese euphemistic parlance, “harmonized”) and therefore news of the event in question is forbidden from being published online.
  • scintillating analysis: if you’re going to lay your bare balls out (ladies too!) on the chopping block and actually devote time to pumping out a post, kindly make sure you’re shedding new light on an issue or supplying us with novel insight. Otherwise what you’re doing isn’t blogging, but rather a repository for your practice keyboard strokes. Sure, sure, you’ll say. It’s a democracy…I can publish what I like. Yet that doesn’t mean you can call yours a blog just yet. A blog means you’re an author. An author means people read your stuff, that you’ve got an audience. Audience equals readership. And readership craves novelty. If you omit any of the previous steps, you’re mentally masturbating, not blogging.
  • great photography: can good blogs still exist in which photography doesn’t play a prominent role? Neither do I buy the excuse that you don’t use snaps because you’re not technologically-inclined or that you can’t find suitable images from the vast trove of online archives. As of the end of the naughts, that particular excuse has flown out the window.
  • roiling discussion: there must be a way – either through comments or another means – of demonstrating to an uninvolved third-party that your blog enjoys a degree of popularity and can be vetted by a neutral source. If you can’t demonstrate this, do you even have a right to call yourself a “blog?” Sure, you may have the makings of a blog or a blog-in-training, but you’re not really full-fledged yet. Be careful to brand yourself as such within the community of your blogging peers until you’re ready to go. We talked about this the other day.

Things China Blogs Should Definitely Not Have:

  • crossposting as a way to riff off your own posts: Crossposting works like this: I read a great post online and then proceed to pull apart its structure in order to create my own post. I dump in a few obsequious remarks between the original item’s clever paragraphs with few gleanings other than your ability to showcase how capably I know the English language. Just consider how much this theme and variations activity actually contributes to the glut of information and its consequent spread of rampant amateurism online. Crossposting should be banned.
  • ranty anti-Chinese, anti-PRC screeds: be thankful the Chinese even give your blogging habit a raison d’etre, son! And for this reason alone, be thankful by not taking the first opportunity to slag off on those very same people and/or culture which actually form your wannabe meal ticket. Going off half-cocked about the Chinese is also bad form and makes you look like a boob. Rants on blogs is not professionalism nor shippable art. It’s just porn.
  • regurgitated news: there are too many “China” sites doing this. Too many aggregator sites and too many news junkies – news addicts, actually – reproducing stuff we already know about. So how many search engine-based news boards can there actually be? How many translated news sites can there actually be? And what makes your regurgitation blog different from the hundreds – even thousands – of news blogs presently serving the same market? See what I mean? Now use this to justify why we need yours.
  • posts made to satisfy your inner graphomaniac: posting for posting’s sake is not blogging, even if you think it to be the case. While this might be an outward manifestation of your inner-need to post anything on a regular basis, it does not a genuine blog post make. This, I believe, is the malaise Keen so aptly depicted in The Cult of the Amateur.

I’ll be the fist to volunteer to remove my own blog if I thought for one second that I were doing scant more than than making noise and rattling people’s cages.

So what do you think?

Share

25 Responses to “A Desperate Need to Reduce the Number of “Chinese” Blogs…Starting With Mine, Perhaps?”

  • [...] gen­er­ous with his praise of china/divide in the past, recent wrote a post on his blog bemoan­ing the glut of English-language China blogs, includ­ing his own. Iron­i­cally, I didn’t notice it until Richard Burger expressed [...]

  • [...] I ever needed a final push to revamp this blog, Adam Daniel Mezei has certainly provided it. He argues for a drastic reduction in the number of China blogs out there [...]

  • Plenary:

    All you need to do is talk to Berger in Chinese and he’ll look at you as if you just landed from the island on Lost.

    That is how I know.

    • ADM:

      Do you know this from personal experience, Plenary? Or is it more of a fantasy that you have about Mr. Berger?

  • [...] been part of a great series of recent exchanges for a recent post of mine that was subsequently briskly picked up by the English-language Chinese blogosphere (heretofore to [...]

  • Mark:

    If a blog is not interesting, people won’t read it. Some people have time to read everything, others have time just to read one or two. Why the need to reduce the number of blogs? It’s a self-selecting process and not for anyone here to tell us what we should or shouldn’t read. And what about if a great new blog came along? How would that be able to break into your proposed streamlined list?

  • Come On:

    Yes to Plenary. That Richard Burger from Peking Duck censors any comments critical of him even if he gets his kicks from spearing others. Hypocrit.

    The dude only lived in China for 3 years but acts like he is the emperor of the world. Get rid of his blog.

  • Alex:

    I agree completely, both with you and with Tait. I find a great problem is finding good new blogs amongst the chaff. Most blogroles of established blogs date back to pre-07 while those new ones that get the most links often self-generate those links and aren’t the ones I’m most interested in.

    I think the problem is of filtering. I thank Twitter for making that easier, but think there may also be better ways.

    • ADM:

      Hi Alex,

      You might be interested to know that not all blogrolls, as you write:

      “…date back to pre-07…”

      Dan Harris of China Law Blog, for instance, does a masterful job of regularly updating his blogroll. Have you gone by there for a look of late? http://www.chinalawblog.com — have a look at the right-hand side. Might be very surprised to see some newer sites you might not have seen before.

  • Nice title – had even Roland at ESWN hooked. And for a second there – thought you going all ‘chairman Darrell Coleman’ (a.k.a. holder of the ‘biggest Internet thread in history’) on us.

    But in the end – nice critique on what may be just another bubble related to P.R. China – the ‘Blog Bubble’. It will be interesting to see who sticks around after the ‘burst’.

    • ADM:

      Hi Matt,

      Good to see you here…and thanks for the giggle. I like how you’ve termed that: “the blog bubble.” I think you may have even given me some fodder for a new post…let me think about that some more and see what comes out of it.

      • Have quip, will travel. Can’t afford to blog – so I gadfly around the world instead. When you do think of compiling that article, drop me a line – I may want to make a couple of observations.

        • ADM:

          Why don’t you assemble something rough, M., and we can all work into a joint post? I was serious when I’d suggested it by email…

          • Check your e-mail box, responded to the e-mail’s and what was discussed. Willing to draft an outline, give me a couple of days. Furthermore – if there are anymore bloggers or journalists you think that may be interested – forward them my original e-mail.

            I am curious to know what type of response would be had for this – given that this could be a pretty big collaboration.

  • Eric Havaby:

    We,, I’ve just found one China related blog that I certainly don’t need.

    How arrogant.

  • Plenary:

    Excellent. Can we start with Peking Duck being shut down?

    It seems to meet all the criteria that you list above, and the person running it is incredibly nasty and self-congratulatory. He thinks that his postings on China are in some way more than simply his opinion on the country. I especially like when he cites a scholar or official’s analysis and then goes on to say, “But I disagree”, as if the fact that he has a blog entitles him to be taken seriously. People who agree with his view are praised for their insights, and those who disagree are hammered at and their comments deleted.

    It’s a wonderful combination of disgusting and highly amusing. Especially when you realize that he does not speak or read Chinese.

  • [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Will Moss, Marta Cooper. Marta Cooper said: RT @imagethief: @therealadm says cull the China blogs. Gulp. http://ow.ly/1MSSv H/T @thepekingduck [...]

  • No love for translators, eh? Ah well, anyway, in light of this post I felt I should swing by to let you know that (1) I have my own blog you could link my name to and (2) my balls are gigantic.

    • ADM:

      Your balls definitely roll in and precede themselves…and about your blogging prowess, CC? Ain’t no one betta’!

  • This post has clearly hit a nerve on Twitter. A lot of self-reflection for many out there. Perhaps this is why nobody dares say anything here. Ha.

    I think also we have an overdose of opinions via twitter. It’s a pretty horrid echo chamber sometimes.

    • ADM:

      @SAT | What are your thoughts on the English-language Chinese blogosphere in general…ugh, I’m going to invent a new name for this, ps, because that name’s a mouthful…do you think it serves the purpose, or does there need to be a culling? Naturally, we’re not discussing photoblogs in this instance…

  • [...] has been weighing on me a lot lately, and this excellent post by another blogger showed me I’m not the only one who thinks China now has too many blogs, including my own. [...]

  • Tait:

    I think “meh”. I just don’t follow ones that aren’t unique enough.

    But I was talking with some people about making a new kind of online community focused on translating content from Chinese to English. It could replace some blogs and show a more balanced view of China through the contributions of several (or many) people, unlike some blogs that have a heavy slant.

    • ADM:

      I’d agree with you there, Tait. There are some initial efforts out there, but the ones I’ve seen aren’t user-friendly enough that I’d actually want to go there on a regular basis. There needs to be tons of improvement in this regard. Would be interested in talking to you some more about that.

ADMTV:
Subscribe by email!

Join Adam Daniel Mezei's Mailing List Today!
* indicates required
My Latest Book Reviews: